← Rankings
Head-to-head comparison

Howard Schultz vs MacKenzie Scott

Who is richer—and who do voters respect more?

MacKenzie Scott has the larger estimated fortune ($38B vs $4B), while the public-impact ranking measures something different: which billionaire voters believe has contributed more positively. Compare their records and cast your vote.

This matchup is based on public perception from anonymous votes. Pick the person you think had the better impact.

At a glance
Howard Schultz
MacKenzie Scott
$4B
Estimated net worth
$38B
Starbucks
Main company
Amazon (divorce settlement)
#7
Public rank
#16
Open
Matchup result
Open

Estimated net worth is shown in USD billions. The public rank and matchup result update as votes change.

Crowd vote
Howard Schultz portrait
Howard Schultz
vs
MacKenzie Scott portrait
MacKenzie Scott

Still open — the public hasn't settled it yet. Cast a vote and help decide it.

Vote this matchup →

The short case

Case for Howard
Expanded healthcare benefits for hourly workers; Schultz Family Foundation
What voters may question: Aggressive union-busting at Starbucks; underpaid workers relative to his wealth
Case for MacKenzie
Fastest large-scale wealth redistribution in history; gives with minimal overhead
What voters may question: Still immensely wealthy; fortune originated from Amazon labor practices
Howard Schultz
MacKenzie Scott
1,565
ELO
1,451
56%
Win rate
47%
7d trend
57%
Divisive ↓
33%
Full rankings