← Rankings
Head-to-head comparison

Bill Gates vs MacKenzie Scott

Who is richer—and who do voters respect more?

Bill Gates has the larger estimated fortune ($107B vs $38B), while the public-impact ranking measures something different: which billionaire voters believe has contributed more positively. Compare their records and cast your vote.

This matchup is based on public perception from anonymous votes. Pick the person you think had the better impact.

At a glance
Bill Gates
MacKenzie Scott
$107B
Estimated net worth
$38B
Microsoft
Main company
Amazon (divorce settlement)
#20
Public rank
#16
Open
Matchup result
Open

Estimated net worth is shown in USD billions. The public rank and matchup result update as votes change.

Crowd vote
Bill Gates portrait
Bill Gates
vs
MacKenzie Scott portrait
MacKenzie Scott

Still open — the public hasn't settled it yet. Cast a vote and help decide it.

Vote this matchup →

The short case

Case for Bill
Gates Foundation has saved millions of lives through vaccination and malaria programs
What voters may question: Criticized for influence over global health policy without democratic accountability
Case for MacKenzie
Fastest large-scale wealth redistribution in history; gives with minimal overhead
What voters may question: Still immensely wealthy; fortune originated from Amazon labor practices
Bill Gates
MacKenzie Scott
1,424
ELO
1,451
39%
Win rate
47%
7d trend
0%
Divisive ↓
33%
Full rankings